The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > RECORD

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 09-19-2016, 08:42 AM
howthewestwas1 howthewestwas1 is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 455
Default

I added some small overdubs to each song, including my tele+princeton reverb to the "mint" track and very subtle lead line toward the end of "furrowed brow". Just ran it straight down the middle - seems to sit well!
__________________
1938 Martin 00-18
1942 Martin 00-18
Collings 001-14T
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-19-2016, 08:58 PM
ChuckS's Avatar
ChuckS ChuckS is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 3,649
Default

I much prefer the XY over the M-S setup. To me, the bass is getting lost in the M-S (probably not getting a full representation of the guitar's audio output from the Mid mic); I'm assuming the sides are picking up mostly reflections instead of any direct sounds from the guitar.

I don't feel that the guitar is a wide enough audio source to get the full benefit of M-S (benefit such as being able to adjust the width of the stereo field post recording): If the M-S setup is backed off from the guitar the Mid mic gets a better blend of the guitar's output but the Side mic gets nothing directly from the guitar; if the setup is brought in close enough for the Side mic to get some of the guitar's direct sound then the Mid mic is so close that it only gets sound from a small section of the guitar.

Are you considering trying a spaced pair arrangement? I think it's easier to get a nice XY recording, but with some experimentation on mic placement spaced pair can be really nice.
__________________
Chuck

2012 Carruth 12-fret 000 in Pernambuco and Adi
2010 Poling Sierra in Cuban Mahogany and Lutz
2015 Posch 13-fret 00 in Indian Rosewood and Adi

Last edited by ChuckS; 09-20-2016 at 08:38 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-20-2016, 01:15 PM
howthewestwas1 howthewestwas1 is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 455
Default

Chuck, thanks for the comments. I agree with you assessment regarding potential pitfalls of Mid-side in this application. In retrospect, using a LDC rather than a SDC for the mid mic seems to exacerbate this pitfalls. I'm not giving up on mid-side yet but at this time, I too greatly prefer the XY technique.

I have not yet dabbled with spaced pair as I am new to stereo recording and it is my understanding that spaced pairs are most susceptible to phase issues. However as I am getting more comfortable with mic'ing, positioning, etc...I will eventually give it a shot!

Thanks again!
__________________
1938 Martin 00-18
1942 Martin 00-18
Collings 001-14T
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-20-2016, 01:53 PM
ChuckS's Avatar
ChuckS ChuckS is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 3,649
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by howthewestwas1 View Post
Chuck, thanks for the comments. I agree with you assessment regarding potential pitfalls of Mid-side in this application. In retrospect, using a LDC rather than a SDC for the mid mic seems to exacerbate this pitfalls. I'm not giving up on mid-side yet but at this time, I too greatly prefer the XY technique.

I have not yet dabbled with spaced pair as I am new to stereo recording and it is my understanding that spaced pairs are most susceptible to phase issues. However as I am getting more comfortable with mic'ing, positioning, etc...I will eventually give it a shot!

Thanks again!
Regarding spaced pair recording, you do have to be aware of phase issues (comb filtering). However, assuming you aren't concerned about collapsing down to mono, the phase concerns can be dealt with if you pan one mic hard left and the other mic hard right. The distance between the mics can be set/adjusted to provide the width of the stereo field you desire (don't set the pan toward center to adjust the width of the stereo field).
__________________
Chuck

2012 Carruth 12-fret 000 in Pernambuco and Adi
2010 Poling Sierra in Cuban Mahogany and Lutz
2015 Posch 13-fret 00 in Indian Rosewood and Adi
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-25-2016, 05:26 PM
howthewestwas1 howthewestwas1 is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 455
Default

Not having much luck with spaced pair yet but did experiment with setting of the neumanns in XY as such.



I find that having the top mic (rather than the bottom) angled toward the bridge reduces some of the boominess.

I re-recorded "The Furrowed Brow" with this setup and have replaced the original file with the new version.

Also did this new tune, "The Gray House"

__________________
1938 Martin 00-18
1942 Martin 00-18
Collings 001-14T
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 09-25-2016, 06:15 PM
Doug Young's Avatar
Doug Young Doug Young is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 9,916
Default

Spaced pairs should be the easiest technique - there are fewer constraints. Just put the mics where they sound good somewhere around the body/neck joint and somewhere around the bridge, and record. Fix the stereo image by adjusting levels in the mix.

A variation I've found to be almost foolproof is to set the mics up at about the level of the sounhole, or slightly higher, at the same level, about 15-20 inches apart. Aim them straight forward, or turned in slightly. Sit down with the mics around 12 inches away (or try anywhere from around 8 to 24 inches away), and move your chair left or right to balance the levels. That's it. Should sound great.

Here's a birds-eye view of one such setup, I think this was 20 inches apart, maybe 10-12 inches from the guitar:

Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-27-2016, 12:46 PM
howthewestwas1 howthewestwas1 is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 455
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Young View Post
Spaced pairs should be the easiest technique - there are fewer constraints. Just put the mics where they sound good somewhere around the body/neck joint and somewhere around the bridge, and record. Fix the stereo image by adjusting levels in the mix.

A variation I've found to be almost foolproof is to set the mics up at about the level of the sounhole, or slightly higher, at the same level, about 15-20 inches apart. Aim them straight forward, or turned in slightly. Sit down with the mics around 12 inches away (or try anywhere from around 8 to 24 inches away), and move your chair left or right to balance the levels. That's it. Should sound great.

Here's a birds-eye view of one such setup, I think this was 20 inches apart, maybe 10-12 inches from the guitar:

Doug, thanks so much for this! So I take it that the 3:1 rule is more of a guideline? That's the part that I was struggling with. Thanks again.
__________________
1938 Martin 00-18
1942 Martin 00-18
Collings 001-14T
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-27-2016, 03:12 PM
Doug Young's Avatar
Doug Young Doug Young is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 9,916
Default

The 3-1 rule is basically all but impossible to achieve with solo guitar, unless you mic very close. It's a good rule to understand, but it's good to keep in mind that all these micing techniques were developed for things very different than recording solo acoustic guitar, so you have the take the ideas with a grain of salt.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-27-2016, 03:32 PM
howthewestwas1 howthewestwas1 is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 455
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Young View Post
The 3-1 rule is basically all but impossible to achieve with solo guitar, unless you mic very close. It's a good rule to understand, but it's good to keep in mind that all these micing techniques were developed for things very different than recording solo acoustic guitar, so you have the take the ideas with a grain of salt.
That is very reassuring because I was really struggling with that! Thanks again!
__________________
1938 Martin 00-18
1942 Martin 00-18
Collings 001-14T
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-27-2016, 06:39 PM
rick-slo's Avatar
rick-slo rick-slo is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 17,235
Default

3:1 rule does not apply at all for recording a solo guitar
__________________
Derek Coombs
Youtube -> Website -> Music -> Tabs
Guitars by Mark Blanchard, Albert&Mueller, Paul Woolson, Collings, Composite Acoustics, and Derek Coombs

"Reality is that which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away."

Woods hands pick by eye and ear
Made to one with pride and love
To be that we hold so dear
A voice from heavens above
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-29-2016, 09:05 AM
Timothy Lawler Timothy Lawler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 720
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rick-slo View Post
3:1 rule does not apply at all for recording a solo guitar
I agree.

What I was taught a number of years ago was that the 3:1 rule originated as a mic placement guide when setting up mikes on 2 or more different instruments, specifically when the mikes are going to be summed. The idea is to keep each mic 3x closer to its assigned instrument than to another nearby instrument that has its own mic. That reduces bleed from the competing instrument in the mikes' sound capture and so reduces comb filtering when the mikes are summed.

Now, you may find that you get a great sound with mikes that far apart in A B placement on a guitar. But that isn't related to the 3:1 rule.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-29-2016, 10:33 AM
rick-slo's Avatar
rick-slo rick-slo is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 17,235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Timothy Lawler View Post
I agree.

What I was taught a number of years ago was that the 3:1 rule originated as a mic placement guide when setting up mikes on 2 or more different instruments, specifically when the mikes are going to be summed. The idea is to keep each mic 3x closer to its assigned instrument than to another nearby instrument that has its own mic. That reduces bleed from the competing instrument in the mikes' sound capture and so reduces comb filtering when the mikes are summed.
Yes, and as long as you stay stereo. Also, by the way, even for mic'ing two or more instruments the 3:1 rule has nothing to do with mono compatibility,
and in fact the limitations of setting up mikes according to 3:1 rule may work against tweaking mike positioning to achieve better mono compatibility.
__________________
Derek Coombs
Youtube -> Website -> Music -> Tabs
Guitars by Mark Blanchard, Albert&Mueller, Paul Woolson, Collings, Composite Acoustics, and Derek Coombs

"Reality is that which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away."

Woods hands pick by eye and ear
Made to one with pride and love
To be that we hold so dear
A voice from heavens above
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-29-2016, 11:49 AM
ukejon ukejon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 6,603
Default

Just curious, Doug. Do the two mics running into the Zoom override the built-in X-Y mics on the unit? Also, is there any discernible machine noise from the Zoom that shows up on your recordings or is it pretty much silent.
__________________
My YouTube Page:
http://www.youtube.com/user/ukejon



2014 Pono N30 DC EIR/Spruce crossover
2009 Pono koa parlor (NAMM prototype)
2018 Maton EBG808TEC
2014 Hatcher Greta 13 fret cutaway in EIR/cedar
2017 Hatcher Josie fan fret mahogany
1973 Sigma GCR7 (OM model) rosewood and spruce
2014 Rainsong OM1000N2
....and about 5 really nice tenor ukuleles at any given moment
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-29-2016, 04:40 PM
Doug Young's Avatar
Doug Young Doug Young is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 9,916
Default

The zoom has no disk drive or fan, so it's totally quiet. The zoom isnt my normal recording chain, but I use it for videos, and it would certainly be fine for recording a. Cd - I know people doing that. The h6 allows the built in Mics plus up to 4 others, each to a different track. The built in mica can also be replaced with other options.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-26-2016, 08:04 PM
Sage97 Sage97 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: GA
Posts: 7,720
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Young View Post
Spaced pairs should be the easiest technique - there are fewer constraints. Just put the mics where they sound good somewhere around the body/neck joint and somewhere around the bridge, and record. Fix the stereo image by adjusting levels in the mix.

A variation I've found to be almost foolproof is to set the mics up at about the level of the sounhole, or slightly higher, at the same level, about 15-20 inches apart. Aim them straight forward, or turned in slightly. Sit down with the mics around 12 inches away (or try anywhere from around 8 to 24 inches away), and move your chair left or right to balance the levels. That's it. Should sound great.

Here's a birds-eye view of one such setup, I think this was 20 inches apart, maybe 10-12 inches from the guitar:

That's exactly how I record and had no clue that it even had a name until now. I hard pan left and right, sit in front with the guitar and move around until it sounds best and hit record. Maybe I couldn't hear any phase issues because I always hard pan. Then again, none of my recordings are masterpieces. I just enjoy making noise with my guitars. .
__________________
"Dreams are the answers to questions that we haven't figured out how to ask." - Mulder
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > RECORD






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=