#1
|
||||
|
||||
Diatonic Scale Construction
Hi, everyone. I'm practicing constructing diatonic scales and I'm having trouble understanding the concept of the double flat/sharp.
It is just used for "forcing" the musical alphabet to remain in alphabetical order when the scale is written? The intervals for the diatonic scale are W-W-H-W-W-W-H so, with that information applied to the chromatic scale, the A# diatonic scale (for instance) is apparently understood to be: A# B# C## D## E# F## G## A# That is truly a headache to look at and think about! Is it "wrong" to express the A# diatonic as: A# C D D# F G A A# ? I'm sure that's blasphemous to the music theory gods but I couldnt help but ask. Also, are there double flat/sharp diatonic scales as well? If so, why would that even be necessary?? Thanks a bunch, everyone. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Hope this helps Matt
__________________
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by ignorance or stupidity (Harlon's razor) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
A#? Unless I am missing something, this should be Bb - which is Bb, C, D, Eb, F, G, A. Forget A# unless it is an academic excercise.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
From a practical standpoing - double flats or sharps are only theoretical (or mathematically possible). Our instruments are mostly compensated, and rather than drive yourself nuts, just stay with the keys which are common (unless you like being driven nuts and living in a realm that even most other gutiarists will underappreciate). If you are an eclectic composer carving out your niche by being unusual then perhaps it would be a viable avenue, but in 46 years of guitaring, I've never been asked to write, arrange, or accompany in double flats or sharps yet... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
As has been posted above, you should never run into a double sharp when working with major scales.
However, you will run into them if in some of the harmonic minor scales... G# Harmonic Minor G# A# B C# D# E F## G# D# Harmonic Minor D# E# F# G# A# B C## D# A# Harmonic Minor A# B# C# D# E# F# G## A# |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks a bunch, everyone - this helps a ton. I'm reading an ebook on Chord-Melody style guitar, and it asked me to practice writing diatonic scales. My only other concern is the possibility of a double flatted "key" (assuming "key" = the first note of the diatonic scale) One of the scales it told me I should've came up with is: C## D## E## F## G## A## B## C
Could this be a typo? I have no idea how I was supposed to come up with this. It's the only "double sharp" key they have in the list of possible diatonic scales. For the curious, heres a link to the book: http://www.scribd.com/doc/12360067/L...dByColinSobers |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
__________________
Ibanez Artwood AC900 Eng/EIR Yamaha LL16 Eng/EIR Webber OM Eng/EIR ♫ Transcriptions (Yes, my PM Inbox is always full. For now, please send me an email at [my agf username]@gmail.com ) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
As others mentioned, in practice scales with more than six sharps or flats (requiring double sharps or flats) are more commonly written with flats or sharps. I'd suggest looking at the circle of fifths, as it will clue you in to which scale roots are 'sharp keys' and which are 'flat keys.' As others mentioned, the key of A# is more commonly seen as Bb, which is a lot easier to read (only two flats to worry about). Bryan |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Tnevermind
__________________
"Still a man hears what he wants to hear, and disregards the rest." --Paul Simon |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Well, it's something to go deeper, but don't get stuck in that math discussion, it's just a matter of sound. I mean, leave those concepts when you're away from the guitar. Otherwise you will be confused while playing
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Yes, it is primarily a matter of sound...music when only defined or written on paper, or in discussions without an instrument in hand, is as useless as a snooze button on a smoke alarm... |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Good one, Larry!
__________________
Larrivee OO-05 Larrivee OM-03R Eastman AC308 Pono OO-20 Pono OP-30DC |