#16
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
What I was saying, as Alan and Frank have said, is that sometimes things are the way they are for a reason. Experimentation is great to find new better ways of doing things. But, if you can't show that's it's better, I'm going to go with years (decades, really) of experience every time. That's all.
__________________
Chris _____ Guild '56 A-50, '57 CE-100, '60 X-150, '62 F-20, '64 Mark II, '65 SF IV, '75 F-112, '75 Mark IVP, '90 Pilot, '93 X-500, '97 Bluesbird Acorn House Guitars Parlor #1, Butternut Deuce, Rounder, Kulakeiki G&L '93 Legacy Lute '03 Lyn Elder |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I'll go on record to say, I think it is better, for me. I used the terms acceptable and not that bad because I am not going to say it is the next best thing to sliced bread. Others used to turning a third of a turn and expecting to hear the pitch go up a certain amount may get real ticked off when it doesn't. But in shear mechanics, it works just fine. I think it is better because I want opposing tuners and so does the OP. Decades of experience is not going to change that.
__________________
Fred |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Fair question - there are two reasons. The first is that it will be a crossover, rather than a classical, so I want it to look more like a steel string. The other is that slotted headstocks are a pain to re-string.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Thinning the headstock also helps, most traditional headstocks are around 14mm ""ish"" classicals upwards of 19mm.
I have thinned a headstock down to 10mm with no issues to create more projection of a tuner for your exact situation. Steve
__________________
Cole Clark Fat Lady Gretsch Electromatic Martin CEO7 Maton Messiah Taylor 814CE |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks Steve. Based on that info and Printer2's photo, I think this is workable. It seems even one extra millimeter buys a full extra wrap.
|