#31
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks Bill
It varies, but hopefully less blood and tears than sweat. Thanks for the nice comments. |
#32
|
||||
|
||||
Here are a couple more shots of the 0-12 with binding:
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
Mighty clean work (as usual) John O...
__________________
A bunch of nice archtops, flattops, a gypsy & nylon strings… |
#34
|
||||
|
||||
I agree with your take on the simple butt wedge design. Its classic and Ive not seen anything that i like better. Nice clean job. Very tasteful.
Come to think of it, the only variation that i like as well as the simple taper is a simpler non- taper like that often seen on classical guitars.
__________________
Kinnaird Guitars |
#35
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks Bob
Quote:
I started to move on to the neck. I decided to go with a one piece neck for this one. Usually I do some sort of laminated neck, but I had such a nice piece of mahogany, I thought I would just stick with the one-piece for this one. Here are a couple of shots of beginning of the process. Here was just a quick layup of the neck with a fretboard, a quick check to make sure I made the right measurement for the scale length etc. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Been following this with great admiration. Shaping up nicely with a substantial nod to traditional aesthetics ... which I favor.
I'm curious, have you done any builds with a recurve of the upper bout into the f-board extension ... sort of a renaissance look? |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Love the simple elegance John
|
#38
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Thanks Ross. Believe me I like to over-do it sometimes, but it means a lot to me when people see the elegance in a simple design. That said, the rosette has over 150 pieces in it, so it really wasn't that simple to put together. |
#39
|
||||
|
||||
Hey John, that's quite nice. Sweet looking guitar!
Steve |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
The rosette does look intricate but this piece is just screaming edgebust finish ❤️ Really liking this a lot.
Need to visit your shop. Just a stone throw away here in RI. Last edited by ross748; 12-29-2016 at 11:26 PM. |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Late to this party, but just wanted to say this is shaping up beautifully!
|
#42
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks Steve, of course you and Ryan are doing assume stuff,
Quote:
Thanks Louie, this one is little different from what I had a Woodstock, but most of what is under the hood so to speak pretty much remains the same. (of course adjusted for the body size.) |
#43
|
||||
|
||||
Here are a few shots of the putting the titanium trussrod together for this one. I think I have posted some of the process before, but I don't know if I showed the bending procedure. It is a one-way truss rod but (again) I like it for it's simplicity.
|
#44
|
||||
|
||||
Here are a couple of shots of the headstock for this one. There is probably a business reason to make one and one style headstock but as a custom builder, I have decided to do a couple of different options. My Straight String Pull (SSP) headstock is my default and I have covered the reasoning for that idea before. I have a client who owns a number of my guitars and we are working one a few ideas for his next (couple) of guitars. One of them will be an archtop that he wanted to go with a slightly different headstock than my standard SSP. This is when we came up with the NQSSP (Not Quite Straight String Pull.) It will still get my Stealth Truss Rod Cover
First up is the headstock just after I inlayed the Maple logo and the Stealth Truss Rod cover removed. Speaking of Stealth, this one will be getting Gotoh Stealth Tuners, You can see the counterbores all set for these. In the photo below the logo has been cleaned up. I contemplated binding the headstock, but since I used rosewood for the front, I decided to go sans binding on this one |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Love those simple appointments. Classic and classy.
Pat |