#1
|
|||
|
|||
Vintage 000-18 or new Martin 000-42 before a long break of no buying?
I have been on Reverb probably every day this year and have acquired three beautiful vintage Gibson/Martin guitars this year as well. My goal for 2018 is to not even look at a potential purchase and focus on my playing. I'd like to get myself a birthday/christmas gift that will last a lifetime and retain it's value similar to my other vintages. I was looking into a 40's 000-18 or a newer 000-42. I want something from the Martin like that will only go up in value. What are your thoughts on these two models?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Monetary value, the 000-18 if it has no issues or problems and is all original. Someone can always get a 000-42 but they have made all the 40's 000-18s they are going to.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Considering the Gibsons you have, you're already acclimated to playing and caring for vintage guitars. With that in mind and the potential for appreciated value, I'd say the 40's 000-18 is the clear cut winner. And for me it's the guitar I'd rather play. That's not to say someone else wouldn't prefer the 000-42, but I wouldn't.
Here are my '36 and '48 000-18's. Very enjoyable guitars. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I worked my way up.
And I don't own a boat, motorcycle, smoke, drink, etc. At least that's how I justify it in my mind, and to my wife.... Anyway, the '36 is a monster in terms of tone and it is setup beautifully by David Eichelbaum, but I enjoy the '48 every bit as much. Actually, I like the full profile 1 11/18" neck a little better. You should be able to find a very clean late 40's 000-18 under $6k. My '48 has a lot of play wear and several well repaired cracks. You should be able to find something similar under $5k. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I think it depends on which guitar you find more comfortable in playing, a Signature artist model D42 ( the ones I have owned) have all been top notch and there is something about a "pearl top" that other guitars just don't have, but....but, I prefer 000 sized guitars for playing comfort and my 1943 00018 has become my "keeper" . The 000 sized guitars have pretty comparable top sound board sizes as the dreads do and are just thinner bodied guitars which makes them more comfortable to me.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
They are both going to raise in "value" when Martin increases prices. The vintage guitar will more likely have maintenance issues before the 000-42. I would always suggest buying the guitar you will get the most pleasure from while you have it. I don't purchase instruments based on any possible resale value so, from a player's perspective only, I want the guitar I prefer not the one that will appreciate the most.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Just one opinion in a sea of many but I have never been able to make peace with a 1940s or 1950s 000-18. My experience with them has, for lack of a better description, they "shimmer out" when played aggressively. I have given two a try but ended up parting with them fairly quickly. I did like them when approached with a lighter touch though. Never spent enough time on a 000-42 to be able to say anything.
__________________
"You start off playing guitars to get girls & end up talking with middle-aged men about your fingernails" - Ed Gerhard |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
The 000-18 would always be my preference. Out of the whole Martin lineup it is the spec combo that "speaks to me" the most. I find the 42 series too blingy (although I do like the CF Martin headstock inlay on the 42 series).
If it was also a great vintage 000-18 then (for me) it really is a no-brainer. Either way, good problem to have . Later Rob |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
000-18 by a mile. Apart from value, you know what you are getting in old guitars, you don't in new ones - they change in both tone and geometry in the short-to-medium term.
__________________
Tony D http://www.soundclick.com/bands/defa...?bandID=784456 http://www.flickr.com/photos/done_family/ |