The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #151  
Old 02-28-2018, 01:33 PM
catfish catfish is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 648
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Everton FC View Post
As you can see from my signature, I have two from the Godin family. My first was the Seagull Entourage Rustic. $225.00 used, with gigbag. Great guitar, so easy to play, sounds and feels like a more expensive guitar, though light as a feather. I must admit, though, it's the one of my four acoustics I play least...

My S&P Songsmith Concert Hall is my go-to guitar. CDN$80.00 - best $80 I'll ever spend. I love this guitar - it can take pretty hard strumming for it's shape and size, and is wonderful when fingerpicked. There something about the solid spruce top w/the lammy wild cherry b/s that makes this guitar almost sound woodsy, like Mahogany, but not. Hope that makes at least some sense! It's light a feather - almost like a toy. But it growls when I lay into it w/a pick. Both have D'Addario EXP16 PB Lights. As a matter of fact, I never used the EXP16's until I had to put them on the S&P, due to the shop I went to being out of Elixirs! Haven't looked back, in terms of string choice.

Wondering how my Seagull would sound w/80/20s?
Yesterday I put Martin 80/20 012 set of stings on my Seagull M6 Gloss - Sitka Spruce top, Mahogany laminate b&s. I played it yesterday for a little while, it sounded a bit tinny, zingy and with substantially lower volume comparing with previouly used EJ16. Today it started to sound more fully, a bit more loud and with complex overtones (complex for Mahogany, of course ). I like the sound when I fingerpick, it has pure tone, very different from PB. For strumming it is yet zingy. It is surely 'an acquired taste', I will see if I will switch to 80/20, but I'm glad I tried these strings. When I was a teenager (in 1970-ies), these kind of 80/20 were the standard, so I had the experience before but I forgot it.

By the way, I'm suprised that both of your guitars are light as a feather -- mine is heavy, possibly because of the wide chunky neck.
Reply With Quote
  #152  
Old 02-28-2018, 02:01 PM
Everton FC Everton FC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 1,298
Default

My Yamaha and my Alvarez are very heavy. The S&P is incredibly light - like I said, feels almost like a toy. The Gull is a bit "heavier", but the word "heavy" doesn't translate to the Gull, and it's a dread.

The Alvarez is a tank. Ditto the little Yammie. Even though they are not Martin's/Taylor's/et al, they are four interesting, very different guitars. But the S&P would be the keeper, of the group.
__________________

1978 Yamaha FG-331
2020 Recording King ROS-09-TS
2007 Alvarez RF20SM
1936 Supertone 233 "Hawaiian Belle"
1930s Harmony Mandolin

Instagram: new_york_albertan
Reply With Quote
  #153  
Old 02-28-2018, 02:08 PM
catfish catfish is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 648
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Everton FC View Post
My Yamaha and my Alvarez are very heavy. The S&P is incredibly light - like I said, feels almost like a toy. The Gull is a bit "heavier", but the word "heavy" doesn't translate to the Gull, and it's a dread.

The Alvarez is a tank. Ditto the little Yammie. Even though they are not Martin's/Taylor's/et al, they are four interesting, very different guitars. But the S&P would be the keeper, of the group.
My Seagull is also a dread, and, despite of being heavy, is a keeper. It is on a stand and I play it every day. I have a Martin 000-15M which is light as a feather, though.
Reply With Quote
  #154  
Old 02-28-2018, 03:04 PM
random works random works is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,743
Default

Had a LaPatrie that I enjoyed: got it used and a little banged up. It was good for a non-classical player like me for the nylon feel.

I had an S6 for a while. It was a great guitar. I eventually sold it. I would describe it as very dependable and decent sounding. I played in altered tunings and standard.
Reply With Quote
  #155  
Old 02-28-2018, 07:39 PM
Jaden Jaden is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,960
Default

Unfortunately mine wasn’t so great. Back around 1990 I bought my first acoustic steel string guitar, a Norman dreadnought that was beautifully made and finished, but it was all laminate cherry (didn’t realize this), it never warmed up in sound, and resulted in loss of interest in guitar playing for the next 25 years. If I had only stayed with Yamaha (had learned on a student classical) things could have been very different.
Reply With Quote
  #156  
Old 02-28-2018, 10:39 PM
Deadduck Deadduck is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Monroe, LA
Posts: 634
Default

I have a Seagull S6 made in the late 90's. I bought it used 15 years or so ago. Good quality guitar with a good sound. It isn't as nice as my J-15 or D-28, but it's very good for the price. It's my beater guitar so to say, though I certainly don't abuse it. Only Godin product I've owned.
__________________
Keith

Gibson J-45, LR Baggs Anthem SL
Martin D-28, JJB Prestige 330
Seagull S-6
Gibson L-50
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=