The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > RECORD

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-04-2012, 09:20 PM
Fran Guidry Fran Guidry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 3,712
Default Sound on Sound preamp comparison

Sound on Sound magazine in the UK is my candidate for least offensive gear rag. They used an automated piano to create a reproducible source then tested a bunch of preamps with three different mics. The result is too much information, but with a little paring down one might learn something useful.

Here's the description of the test: http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/oct1...eampsmedia.htm

and here's the current discussion thread: http://www.soundonsound.com/forum/sh...part=1#1009249

There are a couple of discussions going on at Gearslutz as well.

If anyone can ABX the difference between two of these samples from the same mic (13 successful out of 16 tries) I'd be very interested.

Fran
__________________
E ho`okani pila kakou ma Kaleponi
Slack Key in California - www.kaleponi.com
My YouTube clips
The Homebrewed Music Blog
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-11-2012, 08:53 PM
Doug Young's Avatar
Doug Young Doug Young is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 9,916
Default

This seems like a well done test. Too bad theres no reasonable way to do it with guitar:-) I downloaded the files and quickly determined there was little sense trying to hear differences, if there are any, they're too small to matter to me. The SOS editor seems to sum it up pretty well:

" , as you can plainly hear, even the cheapest modern preamps manage to deliver a perfectly usable sound that is pretty accurate and uncoloured.

James is quite right when he says mic choice and positioning are far more critical in terms of sound quality and character."
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-11-2012, 09:25 PM
moon moon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Scotland YES!
Posts: 1,983
Default

Thanks for the link Fran. Been too busy with work but will be interested to try the test when I can.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-29-2012, 12:16 PM
Scott Whigham Scott Whigham is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moon View Post
Thanks for the link Fran. Been too busy with work but will be interested to try the test when I can.
+1

Subscribed for when I can listen!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-31-2012, 01:00 PM
Scott Whigham Scott Whigham is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 484
Default

Whew. That's a lot to digest in one sitting. I just listened to each one back to back. They start to be indistinguishable pretty quick. There were three that stood out in the Brauner and MKH but only two that were "Wow!" in the Royer. I question though whether, upon a second listen, that I'd have the same reaction. When I listen back to back like that, some of my "reaction" is really more a comparison to the previous file rather than a comparison to reality. I just can't trust myself in large tests/shootouts like this!!!

My faves on my first pass were: Brauner_C, _D, and _H. MKH_B, _D, and _E. Royer_B, _G (with _H a "Hmmm... maybe that's the same but sheesh...")

Now I'm off to the forums to laugh at myself for (surely) picking the cheapies over the expensive ones

Haha - I laughed when I matched my favorites with the "key". There was a definite difference in my first picks and my last picks in terms of the "accuracy", I bet. What I thought was what was sooooo off.

Last edited by Scott Whigham; 10-31-2012 at 04:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > RECORD






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=