|
View Poll Results: What would you do with this soundhole? | |||
Nothing: leave it alone | 70 | 57.85% | |
Replace & repair the missing piece | 42 | 34.71% | |
Convert it to a large soundhole OM-28"LSV" | 9 | 7.44% | |
Voters: 121. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
All innards are ok. LOVE the tone, soundboard is ok. I yanked a soundhole feedback buster out and it ripped the already weak rosette,
__________________
14-day Return Period -No restocking fee Maury's Music PODCASTS View actual pics of ALL in-stock guitars Martin Guitar Certified Online Dealer Martin Blueridge Martins & More Podcast |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry, I've edited the original post to say the sound is fine.
__________________
14-day Return Period -No restocking fee Maury's Music PODCASTS View actual pics of ALL in-stock guitars Martin Guitar Certified Online Dealer Martin Blueridge Martins & More Podcast |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
In that case, I'd repair it.
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Leave it alone. Handle with the care it deserves, but don't do a repair.
__________________
Santa Cruz H13 Huss & Dalton 00 Custom Santa Cruz OM Grand Boucher SG21G Collings CJ35 Bourgeois Slope D Custom Furch D22TSR Gibson J45 Deluxe Furch OM MM Larrivee OM-02 Paul Beard Resonator Nashville Tele Slick SL-55 Sire Larry Carlton S7 Slick SL-60 Harmony Comet PRS SE Silver Sky Custom S Type Thinline Tele AXL USA Artist AXL USA Bulldog |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
That jagged edge just looks fragile and painful to me, so personally, I'd repair if it can be done in such a way as to not have a negative impact on tone.
But there's no right nor wrong answer to this. It seems from your post like you're leaning toward repair. Last edited by DHart; 08-16-2017 at 12:59 PM. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
I might go with the TR soundhole option. Might raise the resonant frequency some. I did it with a Hoboken Guild D-40, and I liked the results.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
As I think more about it, I'd probably trim out some of the jagged area, so that the edge is smoothed out, without jagged edges or pokey angles, and call it good!
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
DHart is right. There is no right or wrong here. I would round out that jagged edge, to keep it from getting worse, making the sound hole a little egg shaped.
Right now it looks like an accident waiting to happen. (Maury, I love, love, love the Road Series GPRSG that Tim sold me!) |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
DHart wrote:
Quote:
Well, I disagree with you there, in that I think that repairing it is the wiser decision. Leaving it as ragged as it is now is like half breaking off a fingernail, and leaving the remnant dangling from your fingertip instead of trimming it off. Trimming, sanding and smoothing the jagged soundhole edge and painting that with Superglue is another approach to stabilizing the damaged area, and it will obviously take less time and cost less than replacing the spruce chunk that's missing. But if it was my guitar, Maury, I would go ahead and get it restored completely, or as completely as possible. If you stay with a natural finish on the top you're never going to make the restoration completely invisible, but it can be made so that it's not noticeable unless someone is specifically looking for the line where the wood broke. Your call, naturally. But that's what I would do. If this was one of those $150 Gretsch Jim Dandy models, I'd lean towards the fast and dirty option of sanding down the ragged edges and painting it with Superglue. But this is a very nice Martin guitar, and worth the effort to do the job as completely and correctly as possible. It's an heirloom quality instrument, not a cheapo to take along to play as you're floating down a river on a float trip. It would be the wisest course of action, in my opinion. Wade Hampton Miller |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Good lord, did you have the feedback buster glued in there?? I really don't see how you did that but I guess it's plausible.
__________________
Dump The Bucket On It! |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Since you're a Martin dealer, you can always save for another guitar that is more cosmetically appealing. But, you can replace mojo once it's gone. I would leave it alone. My second choice would be to enlarge the sound hole. I would do nothing that requires adding cleats or wood to the top. I made the mistake of ruining a lovely guitar with cleats. It never sounded the same again.
__________________
"Lift your head and smile at trouble. You'll find happiness someday." |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Then I'd say leave it alone and never stick anything in the soundhole ever again. Otherwise, have the soundhole enlarged and the edge beveled and the finish spot repaired. I would NOT pull the neck off and replace the top of splice in new material. That will change its tone.
__________________
(2006) Larrivee OM-03R, (2009) Martin D-16GT, (1998) Fender Am Std Ash Stratocaster, (2013) McKnight McUke, (1989) Kramer Striker ST600, a couple of DIY builds (2013, 2023) |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
That's what I would do. I have heard and played this guitar, and it sounds wonderful. BTW...Who's Maury?
__________________
Margaret Martin: D-28, 00-18V, Custom 000-21, D12-35 Guild: GF-60M Martin C1K ukulele, Kala soprano ukulele Kentucky mandolin |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
I vote for the Tony Rice approach.
__________________
Too many guitars and a couple of banjos |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Repair or not
How cleanly did the piece break off? Would it be an easy repair or lots of ragged edges?
|