#226
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I'm going to continue to dry down the pieces of wood shown in this thread and I'll use them when someone wants it. Its ready to use from this point forward and thats why I showed them in this thread. I've used figured woods a lot over the years. I'll be happy to use woods like this for anyone seeking this type of figure on their guitar. Kevin. |
#227
|
|||
|
|||
This is a multi-laminated neck using sapele/koa.
|
#228
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The picture isn't showing up...but I think you know what I mean. Bet that rim crazy rigid! Brad
__________________
Brad |
#229
|
||||
|
||||
Beautiful work Kevin. Beautiful!
__________________
Life is like a box of chocolates .... |
#230
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Hey Brad, This guitar is engineered to have a thinner top than normal (if I want it to be that way :-)) (Monocoque design), an adjustable neck, and a smooth interior bracing (less friction). So the sides are engineered to take up a lot more of the load than a normal "laminated" side. The headblock is laminated in too, to lessen its tendency to "twist" or rotate. It has a very high strength ufb and there are no flying buttress' attached to the side. Since the sides take up more of the load, I can also manipulate the back more or less, depending on what I'm shooting for. These sides do a fabulous job. All this "extra build" takes time and is optional (translation - not all people want to pay for this stuff). The mass of the sides really helps contribute to a long sustain. Its a neat concept/guitar. I'm still dialing in how all this works together. Come check it out in woodstock. I'm really happy with it. Kevin. |
#231
|
|||
|
|||
thank you cigarfan. hope youre doing well.
Kevin. |
#232
|
|||
|
|||
I was reading a thread on here - Indian Hill, and he was talking about maple and how he feels its under rated, I think so too. Anyway, I didn't want to post my pic in his thread so I'll just reference that thread here http://www.acousticguitarforum.com/f...=335401&page=4
And then post these pics of a maple guitar I made a while back. Maple is awesome! Love it. Maybe its time to work on another maple acoustic :-). Kevin. |
#233
|
|||
|
|||
I use the west systems epoxy for pore fill. The pumps they send with are calibrated (one pump each), but they're calibrated 3 to 1 ratio. Because I tend to mix up smaller batches, I went out and bought two bottles to put the epoxy in. I got them at the Hobby store. Definitely WEIGH each mix ratio (resin/hardener) on a gram scale (three to one ((actually 3.7 to 1 by weight)). Too much hardener and you'll get a gummy mix - won't harden.
This will get you a clear GLASS surface that most finishes will stick to. UV/Poly etc. This is also good glue epoxy. Its super thin, but if you set your timer on your smart phone for ten minutes or so, it will be at just the right consistency for gluing. Zpoxy is a hobby glue/pore filler and shrinks over time. I recommend getting the West Systems instead. It also goes on clear and dries clear, no amber tint (although I like the amber tint). Kevin. |
#234
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#235
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I personally think you'll get better results. Kevin. |
#236
|
|||
|
|||
Here is the back of this maple guitar. The finish came out great on this one. Also - these are my 'Signature Neck Laminations'...a contrasting middle piece with the fine line accents.
Kevin. |
#237
|
||||
|
||||
Looks like The Tree Mahogany inlayed in the center. Very nice even if it isn't.
|
#238
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Its quilted maple. Its The Tree Maple and I got a lot more of it . Nice mild "cool" day in Iowa. I like these days. Hope you have a nice day too. Kevin. |
#239
|
|||
|
|||
I try to be original in most of my ideas. And I've tried to make a point not to out and out copy something of a design. I've duplicated inlays etc...but if something was "questionable" I've tried to "move the lines" until it wasn't plagiarism.
In the end a guitar design/shape still has to: 1. Be appealing. 2. It has to have a shape/design that people will accept. 3. And it still has to function like a guitar. 4. There's more but... Can this criteria be met without copying someone, "yes". I'm always thinking "what can I do to be different?", because I don't come from the Somoygi apprentice school. Id say that is a platform that most of us don't have. Good for them. I'll have to go another way. I'm ok with that, and I don't have negative feelings about them. Ervin chose them from applicants and he didn't just pick anyone and train them. They had something the others didn't. A certain skill or vision, that Ervin saw from amongst the applicants. And he had to relate to them in some way too...I'm sure there are plenty of guys that had great skill that he didn't chose for that reason. I also learned a lesson early on from PRS. I had "legal interaction" with PRS about some issues (in the late 90's), and from there I just tried to make something different. Something where they had no "legal basis" in sending me letters. This is why I don't put birds on my guitars. It taught me a lot about "trademark" and "patent". Correctly put, most guitars are "legally identical". All this said, there is only so much change in a format that will hold three tuners on one side and three on the other side. We are all closely related, things trend, but we should try be a pioneer of some sort. At least try. Thats my thought for today. Kevin. |
#240
|
|||
|
|||
working on something similar for up coming guitar. These are very organic in nature. Top photo has no finish on it. This all blended well.
These is more difficult than the ones that don't wrap so far. Kevin. |