Quote:
Originally Posted by BoB/335
And what would be the pros and cons of those numbers? I would think that each of these are made for a completely different purpose.
Also for the use of a typical acoustic solo/duo with vocals I would think you would want as wide a dispersion as possible. No?
I'm intigued with what I have been reading on the K8's and K10's. I read a comparison (somewhere) between the EV SaX100 (the powered version of my new SX100) and the K10 that was pretty interesting.
|
From the QSC website page on K Series speakers:
DMT
Directivity Matched Transition matches the HF coverage angle to the natural coverage angle of the woofer for uniform frequency response over the entire coverage area.
I would think that the smaller K8 would be better suited for small clubs where the audience would be closer to being on top of the stage and thus its coverage would spread-out to cover more of the front-row audience so there is a lesser chance of "blind audio" spots.
Regards,
SpruceTop