1 11/16 VS 1 3/4 Nut Width... Does It Make A difference???
 

I have read some threads speaking of 1 11/16 vs 1 3/4 nut widths, and how many people say how much of a difference it makes.

The total difference in nut width is 1/16 (.0625) of an inch. So if you divide that by 5 (the 5 spaces between the strings), it comes out to 1/80 (.0125) of an inch additional space between each string.

Is the human finger even able to feel that little of a difference?

If so, does it make that big of a difference?

Or could it all just be in our minds...???...:confused:

Bob
I believe the difference one might feel is a combination of many factors including nut width, neck profile, fretboard radius and even the finish on the neck and how it might cause your skin to drag(or not). I've played some fat necked 1 11/16" that worked for me and some thin profiled 1 3/4" necks that did not feel right. To me, its not the numbers, it's the fit.
Steve

Yes, it makes a differece. Not only is the string spacing a tad wider, the neck is often a bit thicker. I have trouble using my thumb for bass notes with a 1 3/4", but not on a 1 11/16".

To Larry's last point, I think the issue for many isn't so much the nut width as it is the string spacing at the saddle. After a while, many people just get used to a certain spacing and that's what they stick with.

Some of us are likely just sloppy players, regardless of width and spacing. ;)

BobC

I have both 1 11/16 and 1 3/4 widths. I never really thought about it until I started playing my first guitar with a 1 11/16 a lot. When I went back to 1 3/4 I started 'missing' strings by just a small amount. It took awhile before I realized it was the nut width. I can now move between the two (3 actually, my 12 string is 1 13/16) without much trouble.

Given my choice I would choose the 1 3/4. It is more comfortable for me and I have small hands.

Jack

Yes it makes a difference, absolutely. The mind is very capable of discerning very small differences. Try moving a tooth 1mm. OUCH! Okay, so anyway, I've found that the difference isn't enough to keep me from playing. But it can keep me from playing well... as muscle memory has a lot to do with moving around the neck without having to think about where I'm going, and not muting strings, etc. But just as big a difference happens with neck profile. I find that I like Martin's profile at 1-11/16" more than Taylor's... but Larrivee's profile at 1-3/4" is really uncomfortable. So there are a lot of variables... very small ones... that can make a huge difference in the feel of a given instrument, as well as the ease of moving from one to another.

I have both sizes and can move back and forth with relative ease, but there is a distinct difference. The smaller nut requires a little more accuracy to keep from buzzing adjacent strings, but it also means smaller stretches when it counts. I can't say that I like either one better; it depends on what I'm playing.

Also, as others have noted, neck depth and profile also figure into it. I generally favor slim necks, especially if I'm thumbing the 6th string.

Also, the distance between the E strings can be different as well....perhaps further explanation is required with an example...

You can have two guitars with 1 11/16th neck width at the nut but have the string spacing different at the nut on each because they could have different nuts; however both designed for 1 11/16 necks. Ex. One nut could have a 36.5mm space between the E strings while another could have a 34.95mm space between the E strings. The first one will have the strings closer to the ends of the frets and more space between each, the other will have the strings further from the edge of the fretboard and bunched closer together. Same nut size but they will have a different feel.

We are talking small increments but you can feel very small changes.

Yes, for me it makes a very big and noticeable difference. I started playing classical guitars long before I switched to steel strings. I don't use my left thumb for anything other than support and I still play both types and find that narrower necks (under 1 3/4") are just not for me. I can play them, and I suppose that with enough time I'd get used to them, but I don't play as well on a narrower neck so my preferences are for 1 3/4" and wider.

Thanks All
 

You all make very interesting points, and I am sure that there is a difference now.

I have a T5 which has a 1 11/16 nut width, and before that, a Fender DG-100 which had the same. I don't know about any ones before that, because I did not know that there was different sizes.

Thank you all for your responses.

Thank You for this post on AG nut widths. I have long wondered what drives manufactures to go 1 11/16 to 1 3/4 ( 1 12/16ths ) in their guitar design. My conspiritorial thought was that it was somehow cheaper to make a guitar with a narrower nut. I can see with your experience, that nut width and other factors come into play now. Another of Life's big questions answered!

I have guitars with both widths and I can not tell a difference at all.

I have several different spacings across my guitars. When finger picking I can tell in the smaller spacing I need to be more precise particularly when playing a chord with open strings on the narrower string to keep my fretting fingers from making contact with the open strings. This results in less clean playing typically.

On one hand, yes there’s a difference. On the other hand, learning to play guitar means being happy and comfortable across multiple nut widths. It wasn’t long ago that 90% of steel string guitars had 1-11/16” nuts, and no one seemed to care. (I didn’t know the nut width on my college guitar until years later when I started reading here!). Nowadays people seem a lot more fussy acting like 1/16” one way or the other is an absolute deal-breaker. To state the obvious, learning guitar takes practice. 1-11/16”, 1-3/4”, 1-13/16”, 1-7/8”, 1.8”: call me crazy, we should find the tone we love and figure out how to play the guitar. Fairly certain that’s what our guitar heroes did, anyway.