NEW Yamaha SLG 200 n
|
No, just the old one. This looks like fun. Would love to hear the quality of the Blend system.
|
Quote:
The modeling mode sounds quite nice, I must say... |
it's great
i've just taken delivery of the new SLG200N, it's great. With this model Yamaha have remedied a few shortcomings in the previous nylon-string silent guitars. The SLG200N has good string balance with a much better volume balance across the strings. The previous SLGs had very low volume on the bass strings.
The guitar is strung with medium tension strings, the top E string produces a rather 'thin' sound so I replaced it with a hard tension string. The neck is 50mm, so it's a half-way-house between the old SLG130NW and the SLG110. The fretboard is flat. Classical guitarists may think the neck is a bit narrow, contemporary guitarist (like me) would prefer a rounded 48mm fretboard. Overall it's still very playable. A truss rod is a new feature and is very useful. The onboard tuner is a welcome addition. The onboard effects are good. Overall fit and finish has improved also. The gigbag is better padded than with previous models. Overall, it's a a lot of quality for the money. (I'm starting to sound like a magazine reviewer) I also like Godin Multiacs, they have the best fretboard ever and a strong sound, but the treble strings give quite a harsh brittle tone. The SLG produces a lovely soft warm nylon sound. |
Thanks all for your responses!
Tidalstream, do you know what the neck thickness is? |
Yamaha slg200n
the neck is 50mm
|
Slg-200
I bought one of each (steel and nylon) and they are due in any day. I currently own the older version (SLG-110N) of the nylon and love it. Lots of "bang for the buck" in my opinion. I'll comment on the new versions when I have a chance to test drive them.
Chris |
Yamaha slg200s
Quote:
|
Thoughts on SLG200N v. SLG110N
I actually liked the older version (SLG110N) better. I mainly liked the electronics better in the old one, especially when played through headphones (the volume on the newer version was very limited…probably good for you, but I didn’t like the give up).
I liked the feel of the neck of the newer one ever-so-slightly better. The newer one also had an onboard tuner which is not really important to me, but that might appeal to some. It’s a minor issue, but I also liked the on/off switch on the old one better (slide side-to-side other than push in and out). It was easier to tell if it was turned on or off. I suspect some people will accidentally leave in on with the newer version and drain the battery. All and all, I would recommend a mint condition used SLG110N. If you ask 10 people this question, you will likely get 10 different responses. It is all mainly a matter of personal preference. They are both unique and fun guitars and represent great value for the money spent. |
I had a 110 for a short time last year. It was a very nice-sounding, handy instrument. But I found that I much prefer the snap and punch of a real acoustic that's moving air, as well as the vibrations that come through the body. I prefer flamencos for nylon strings (or at least spruce tops on classicals). The 110 was just too mellow sounding for my tastes... but a very quality instrument for those who are looking for what it has to offer.
I haven't tried the 200 yet, but it sounds like it wouldn't be an improvement over the 110 for my particular needs. |
Just got one a week ago. I am having a lot of fun with it. Does it sound just like a well built classical guitar ? Probably not.
|
The 200N does have a better pickup system than the previous models. The acoustic guitar modeling portion sounds less electric and twangy than the regular peizo pickup. Much more natural. You can blend the types as well. After messing with the knob, I am glad to have the SRT choice.
|
Just got a SLG200S
Such Fun to play at 2 -4am when everyone is sleeping.
Kind of bummed they took off the "Echo" effect from the SLG110s, but the new SRT modeling system sounds great I had a SLG100N from 2003, and have always enjoyed that as well. |
Is anybody gigging one of these?
Thanks hunter |
Slg200n
Does anybody know what the total string spacing is on the Yamaha SLG200N?
i.e. at the nut, from the middle of the low E string to the middle of the high E string, in total (e.g. 42mm (or 1.65354 inches)). I would appreciate to know this. |
Quote:
Mark |
Quote:
How does it sound compared to regular nylon string acoustic with pickups? And how does it sound compared to a regular nylon with mics? I usually am quite traditional with my playing because of my classical training, but lately I've been going towards either fingerstyle or bossa nova. would this suite those styles? |
I actually have another question too. Anybody traveling with one of these? Do they really pack small enough to reliably get in the airline overheads? Is the bag protective enough? Unfortunately I may have to order untested since no one in my area stocks them. And I haven't quite been ready to go that far.
Mainly though, is anybody taking these out to gig? If they sound decent, just the look alone would be enough to make them an interesting stage option. Gotta get the crowds attention some way. hunter |
Quote:
My dealer has finally restocked on the nylon version, I should be able to get one today :) |
Quote:
|
I just got one in at the beginning of the week to try out. I have to make a decision Tuesday whether I'm keeping it or not, but I think I will. Here are my opinions of it.
1) My headphones suck. I budgeted for the guitar but did not factor in headphones. I've been using it every morning (while everyone else is sleeping... I'm always the first one up) for practice and will probably continue if I keep it, so a good pair of headphones is necessary. 2) I'm plugging it into a Peavey ecoustic 110 and obviously I haven't had a chance to play live yet, but when I do I'm confident the live sound will be great. I've cranked it up almost to the max and no feedback. Never have to worry about mics again. 3) The sound is good. Surprisingly natural. If you tweak the settings you can get much more sounds than you have with a regular acoustic, plus plugging into an amp or some type of pre amp will allow even more options. I didn't think I would use the blend switch as much as I do. I thought I would keep it on mic... For the natural sound, but the piezo is a really good tool as well. 4) The sustain of each note is longer though. This is an advantage when you want a melody to sing out (example: cavatina), but is a disadvantage when you want notes to disappear (example: stopping open string bass notes). I think that this is just a matter of readjusting playing technique. Overall, great guitar. I think that this is all it is advertised to be, a great practice, studio and live guitar. I will use it for all three. Just to end though. What strings are people using with this. I have to change the factory strings, they're horrible. I usually like Savarez on my Alhambra. Would these be suitable for a classical-electric? Does someone have another string to recommend specifically for this guitar? |
I'm gigging one of these now. Took a trip to the tech for nut and saddle work and some careful adjustments to get optimum flatness on the neck but I now have flamenco approved action which is my norm with a little room left on the saddle. Since it is a stick, I don't expect much to ever change. The guitar comes with what I'd call old school traditional classical guitar action, in the 3+/3.5+ range, with the nut cut a little high. I now sit at about 2.5/3. Still plays clean and is comfortable and comparable to my real flamenco acoustics.
Live it has worked well. If it feeds back I haven't had it happen yet. I run the blend about 3/4. In a live setting the nylon string sound is a fine. A little less convincing up close and personal but still fine. Maybe a little bassy but minor eq adjustments and string choice more or less take care of that. I am not crazy about the headphone sound but if quiet shedding is the goal, it will get the job done. I got it for live performance and easy transportation and it seems to win on both accounts. Also the crowd seems to get a kick out of it. I now have mine strung with my standard gig strings. Hard tension D'Addario composite basses and normal tension Savarez Alliance trebles. This combination works fine especially with the slightly bassy plugged in voice of the guitar. Lastly I don't find the reverbs all that useful. I'll have to experiment recording with them but to my ear they go from off to too lush and tend to push the guitar too far back in the mix. I never even tried the chorus. hunter |
Great instrument, but has minor firmware bug.
I love mt SLG200n & will be taking it to the shop to have the electronics swapped out with one with the firmware fix. The problem as noted by Yamaha is, if you play and hold an "A" on the 4th string 7th fret you may hear a pop. Yamaha describes it as a "pop"' but to me it sounds like I plucked the note twice within a second. Yamaha has a service bulletin that is references this specifically. I was pleasantly surprised. I was expecting to go through a lengthy process of describing it to them & then having to wait for a solution. I saw this issue with 2 samples. My serial number is 3200320, but not sure the range effected. It's a minor problem, but if you are recording, it may be a bigger deal. BTW sometimes I can get it to repeat several times in a row & other times not. Doesn't matter what the settings are & it's audible on the headphone out as well as the main out. Yamaha has updated pcb's in stock for service centers to order.
Kev |
Quote:
Thanks, Mark |
Call the tech support & they will look it up. I'll try to find the reference number they gave me.
Edit: The Service Bulletin is #2032 & the part number is TG603dOO Just added a new pickguard & arm rest. Armrest is a huge improvement in comfort. http://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n...g/SLG200Nx.jpg kev |
Quote:
I like the looks of your 200 n, is it the Natural or Sunburst finish ? It hard for me to tell from the pictures I've seen. |
Mine is the Trans Black version. Although it doesn't show in the photo, in person, you can see that the black is somewhat transparent with a hint of wood color peeking through. The frame is brown wood on the edges. Of course the pick guard & arm rest are custom. I don't know if the firmware bug is present in the steel string model.
kev |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Thanks. You can use 3/8" or 1/4" stock & just cut it to shape from a pattern of your guitar's rim. Leave the bottom flat & shape the top curve however you like. Depending on the wood you choose, finishing can be the most difficult part. I chose to just use a high quality paste wax to give it a nice shine & keep it easy to maintain. BTW the pick guard is 1/8" thick wood that is just applied to the existing PG with double sided tape. I made it a bit bigger & shaped it slightly differently. I used a double sided mounting tape for the arm rest. The foam type is very hard to remove, so I am using an automotive molding tape. It's more of a rubber than foam. I am still experimenting with various mounting tapes. These arm rests for the silent guitar are much easier to make than ones for conventional acoustic guitars because you don't need to shape the under side to keep it off the guitar top. My next project, after I get the nut finished, is to redo the leg rest. Thinking about making one with a cut out center in keeping with the overall design. kev |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum