jima9426 |
10-16-2014 02:00 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsanfilippo5
(Post 3886103)
Im sorry if this had already been discussed, but I am trying to figure out the main differences, other than cosmetic between the new om-28 and the new version om-21…
Looking at the 2 I thought they looked very similar, unless I am missing something?
|
Getting back to this initial question . . .
I have compared the redesigned OM-21 and redesigned OM-28 on several occasions since the OM-28 first arrived at my local dealer and I can say unequivocally that I’ve found a pronounced and difference between the two. Although they share the same basic voicing, the OM-28 has considerably more sonic depth, projection, and resonance. The OM-21 has slightly more note-to-note clarity and the notes are slightly thinner, not that that’s necessarily a bad thing.
The local Martin dealer to which I referred stocks nearly every Standard Series model so they’ve routinely had both OM’s in stock even though they’ve sold one or the other at least a few times over the past few months. So every time I’ve conducted the comparison, it was with a different OM (21 and/or 28) in hand, yet the differences between them remained.
Befuddled by this mystery, I’ve even enlisted friends to compare them, in some cases blindly. They’ve all formed an opinion very similar to mine. Based on their responses, if I had to describe what you might conclude if you did a blind comparison, you could be forgiven for mistaking the OM-28 for being a GP model. In fact, compared to the OM-21, the OM-28 sounds like what I’d imagine a GP-28 would sound like, if such a model existed.
The only difference as far as I can tell between the two that might have an impact on tone is the herringbone purfling on the 28, but the difference is so dramatic that it can’t be the purfling alone.
I hope more of you, who have actually done a side by side comparison, share your findings here.
|