The Acoustic Guitar Forum

The Acoustic Guitar Forum (https://www.acousticguitarforum.com/forums/index.php)
-   Acoustic Amplification (https://www.acousticguitarforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Best acoustic guitar amp under $500.00 (https://www.acousticguitarforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=85410)

joey777 08-29-2006 04:29 PM

Best acoustic guitar amp under $500.00
 
I am looking for an amp for acoustic guitar. The amps I have been looking at are:

Ultrasound AG-50DS3 Acoustic Amp
Roland AC-60
Genz Benz
SWR CAL

I really don't need two channels but really not a problem. I would mainly be using this for home use and recording. I need a amp that is dead quite that has a pure acoustic sound with a nice bottom end.

cpmusic 08-29-2006 04:31 PM

I'd go with the Ultrasound. The others are good, from what I hear, but I think Ultrasound has tonal transparency down to a fine art.

MikeGates 08-29-2006 04:55 PM

I've seen quite a few ads for Ultrasound amps in the classifieds. Maybe you'd like one down there. Give it a look.

schizorage 08-29-2006 05:32 PM

Marshall AS50R
Roland AC-60 (are they 4 or 599 now?)

Those are the only two acoustic amps ive played that I liked... i own the former.

I also played an SWR Strawberry Blonde, but that's outta your range.

joey777 08-29-2006 06:11 PM

I would spend the extra cash for a better amp but it would have to be MUCH better. I would love to get a Rivera Sedona from what I hear but thats too much money for what I have in mind.

CitizenAudio 08-29-2006 10:25 PM

I vote Roland AC-60. For less than 500, you get 2 channels, 60 watts, tilt stand, amp cover, phantom power, boss effects and ability to put on PA stand. Amazing value. After the Roland, I whole heartily put faith in Ultrasound products.

ljguitar 08-29-2006 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joey777
...I need a amp that is dead quite that has a pure acoustic sound with a nice bottom end.

Hi Joey...
The best amp I've ever played was an AER - the model that is about $1500. It was awesome. I own two UltraSound amps - an AG-30 and an AG-50.

An amplifier which meets all your requirements
-home use
-only one channel
-some recording
-dead quiet and a good low end
is the humble UltraSound AG-30. When I only need a single channel, this is what I carry. It is a great stage amp as well, and I've used mine in the middle of bands with the volume control on 6 (it goes to ten).

Also, the UltraSounds are one of the only amps I've ever owned that 6 is louder than 5, 7 is louder than 6, 8 is louder than 7 - all the way to 10. I've never pushed it to distortion, but I have pushed it to my pain threshold...once.

joey777 08-30-2006 09:41 AM

Thanks guys for your input. Does the AG-30 have the same circuitry like the AG-50DS3 without the 2 channels? I know the AG-50DS3 also has 16 digital effects. Are they worth the extra money or is it better to use external effects?

Herb Hunter 08-30-2006 10:06 AM

While I don't understand why one would need an acoustic guitar amp at home or for recording, given the price limit you stated, I'd prefer one of these to a guitar amp: Carvin PM15A powered speaker. 2-way with 15" speaker. 3 dB down at 60 Hz. 350 watts of biamped power. Well below $500.

http://www.carvin.com/products/singl...=1540A&CID=APS

The Carvin S400D, also below your price limit, is an interesting alternative.

http://carvin.com/products/single.ph...=S400&CID=SYS1

joey777 08-30-2006 10:55 AM

Hey Herb...I sometime use a guitar amp for recording with a mic for a different sound instead of going direct. Also I may take my amp out once in a while and weight is a factor. Usually I use the house PA and a smaller amp for a personal monitor. I see your point about getting more for your money but I have to have a quite amp and I am not so sure about the Carvin. Really can't demo a Carvin before you buy. I did played though a Carvin AG-100G before and the transformer went bad in a few days. I guess that could happen with any brand. Do you have personal experience with the Carvin Pa 1540a you suggested?? Is it quite?? It does seem overkill for my needs.

ljguitar 08-30-2006 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joey777
Thanks guys for your input. Does the AG-30 have the same circuitry like the AG-50DS3 without the 2 channels? I know the AG-50DS3 also has 16 digital effects. Are they worth the extra money or is it better to use external effects?

Hi Joey...
Same designs.

I don't think the extra money for effects is warranted, but I don't use effects. If you are one to use effects, the internal ones sound fine.

sharkydude50 08-30-2006 12:57 PM

+1 for the AG50DS3.

joey777 08-30-2006 03:06 PM

Hey Larry.. I usually don't use effects but once in a while a little reverb is nice:)

Herb Hunter 08-30-2006 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joey777
Hey Herb...I sometime use a guitar amp for recording with a mic for a different sound instead of going direct. Also I may take my amp out once in a while and weight is a factor. Usually I use the house PA and a smaller amp for a personal monitor. I see your point about getting more for your money but I have to have a quite amp and I am not so sure about the Carvin. Really can't demo a Carvin before you buy. I did played though a Carvin AG-100G before and the transformer went bad in a few days. I guess that could happen with any brand. Do you have personal experience with the Carvin Pa 1540a you suggested?? Is it quite?? It does seem overkill for my needs.

I own a Carvin mixer, two Carvin power amps and, until I gave it to my nephew, a Carvin DC200 guitar. The poweramps and mixer are very quiet. You could call them and ask what the signal to noise ratio is for the PM15A. Also, they have a ten day return policy.

joey777 08-30-2006 08:31 PM

Thanks Herb


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum

vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=